<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.1d1 20130915//EN" "http://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.1d1/JATS-journalpublishing1.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" article-type="research-article" xml:lang="en">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">JUCR</journal-id>
<journal-title-group>
<journal-title>Journal of Underutilised Crops Research</journal-title>
</journal-title-group>
<issn pub-type="ppub">3105-4277</issn>
<issn pub-type="epub">2958-0994</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name>AOSIS</publisher-name>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">JUCR-5-42</article-id>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.4102/jucr.v5i1.42</article-id>
<article-categories>
<subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
<subject>Original Research</subject>
</subj-group>
</article-categories>
<title-group>
<article-title>Management of <italic>Alternaria</italic> species diseases on <italic>Cleome gynandra</italic> in Zimbabwe</article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
<contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5480-8281</contrib-id>
<name>
<surname>Kaliyati</surname>
<given-names>Joyce R.</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="AF0001">1</xref>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="AF0002">2</xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9247-3056</contrib-id>
<name>
<surname>Mapope</surname>
<given-names>Nyamande</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="AF0001">1</xref>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author">
<contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0009-0006-2696-6884</contrib-id>
<name>
<surname>Manyangarirwa</surname>
<given-names>Walter</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="AF0003">3</xref>
</contrib>
<aff id="AF0001"><label>1</label>Department of Crop Science, Faculty of Plant and Animal Sciences Technology, Marondera University of Agricultural Sciences and Technology, Marondera, Zimbabwe</aff>
<aff id="AF0002"><label>2</label>Department of Science, Zimuto High School, Masvingo, Zimbabwe</aff>
<aff id="AF0003"><label>3</label>Department of Agricultural Sciences, Faculty of Agriculture, Africa University, Mutare, Zimbabwe</aff>
</contrib-group>
<author-notes>
<corresp id="cor1"><bold>Corresponding author:</bold> Joyce Kaliyati, <email xlink:href="m200128a@muast.ac.zw">m200128a@muast.ac.zw</email></corresp>
</author-notes>
<pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>25</day><month>05</month><year>2026</year></pub-date>
<pub-date pub-type="collection"><year>2026</year></pub-date>
<volume>5</volume>
<issue>1</issue>
<elocation-id>42</elocation-id>
<history>
<date date-type="received"><day>05</day><month>09</month><year>2025</year></date>
<date date-type="accepted"><day>21</day><month>04</month><year>2026</year></date>
</history>
<permissions>
<copyright-statement>&#x00A9; 2026. The Authors</copyright-statement>
<copyright-year>2026</copyright-year>
<license license-type="open-access" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">
<license-p>Licensee: AOSIS. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) license.</license-p>
</license>
</permissions>
<abstract>
<sec id="st1">
<title>Background</title>
<p>Angular leaf spot and blight, caused by fungi of the genus <italic>Alternaria</italic>, known as most destructive diseases affecting <italic>Cleome gynandra</italic>, a potential Indigenous African vegetable, being promoted in Zimbabwe. Information on its disease management is scanty.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="st2">
<title>Aim</title>
<p>To isolate, evaluate and propose potential management options against the diseases caused by <italic>Alternaria alternata</italic> and <italic>Alternaria senecionicola</italic>, obtained and identified from Marondera University of Agricultural Sciences and Technology, Agro Industrial Park (MUAST AIP) and Premier areas of Zimbabwe.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="st3">
<title>Setting</title>
<p>Efficacy of fungicides, in a CRD (6&#x002A;2 factorial experiment), Biological Control Agents (3&#x002A;2 factorial experiment) and organic agent (2&#x002A;2 factorial experiment), was evaluated against these species on <italic>C. gynandra</italic>, with three replications.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="st4">
<title>Methods</title>
<p>Fifteen cm plants under greenhouse conditions at MUAST AIP were inoculated and monitored. Data on incidence and severity were collected every week for 3 weeks.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="st5">
<title>Results</title>
<p><italic>A. alternata</italic> and <italic>A. senecionicola</italic> Area Under Disease Progress (AUDPs) and disease incidence were effectively suppressed by all test fungicides (<italic>p</italic> = 0.02) on days 7&#x2013;14 and AUDPCs on days 14&#x2013;21 and had no interactions (<italic>p</italic> = 0.07). There was interaction between <italic>Alternaria</italic> species and fungicides for &#x0025; disease incidence for day 7 (<italic>p</italic> = 0.009), day 14 (<italic>p</italic> = 0.04) and day 21 (<italic>p</italic> = 0.04). Biological control using <italic>Trichoderma harzianum</italic> (T77) and <italic>Saccharomyces cerevisiae</italic> was effective in reducing disease severity and incidence. There were no interactions on AUDPCs days 7&#x2013;14 (<italic>p</italic> = 0.6), but noted on days 14&#x2013;21 (<italic>p</italic> = 0.02). The cattle bile was effective, and it was noted without interactive effects on AUDPCs days 7&#x2013;14 (<italic>p</italic> = 0.2) and days 14&#x2013;21 (<italic>p</italic> = 0.4). &#x0025; disease incidences lack interactive effects on day 7 (<italic>p</italic> = 0.3), and noted on day 14 (<italic>p</italic> = 0.001). There was no interaction on day 21 (<italic>p</italic> = 0.08).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="st6">
<title>Conclusion</title>
<p>Two <italic>Alternaria</italic> species can be managed by fungicides, BCAs and organic agents.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="st7">
<title>Contribution</title>
<p>Diseases were controlled.</p>
</sec>
</abstract>
<kwd-group>
<kwd>fungicides</kwd>
<kwd>biological control</kwd>
<kwd>agent</kwd>
<kwd>organic control</kwd>
<kwd><italic>Alternaria</italic></kwd>
</kwd-group>
<funding-group>
<funding-statement><bold>Funding information</bold> The research was funded by the Ministry of Higher and Tertiary Education, Innovation, Science and Technology Development, Zimbabwe, under grant Ref: AIV/2020/03.</funding-statement>
</funding-group>
</article-meta>
</front>
<body>
<sec id="s0001">
<title>Introduction</title>
<p>Angular leaf spot and blight, caused by fungi of the genus <italic>Alternaria</italic>, are one of the most destructive diseases affecting <italic>Cleome gynandra</italic>, a potential African Indigenous Vegetable crop, being promoted in Zimbabwe. Information about their disease management is scanty. <italic>Alternaria</italic> genus is a fungal genus that has been divided into 24 sections based on molecular and morphological data (Woudenberg et al. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0022">2014</xref>), hence more species can be found to cause diseases on <italic>C. gynandra</italic>, which requires more research on their prevalence and management. <italic>Alternaria</italic> species cause leaf spot diseases in many different plant species, and they cause diseases in aerial plant parts (Agrios <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0001">2005</xref>; Alalade et al. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0002">2017</xref>). <italic>Alternaria alternata</italic> produces mycotoxins, which are responsible for causing the leaf spot disease in plants, and diseases in postharvest in crops (Troncos-Rojas &#x0026; Tiznado-Hernandez <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0021">2014</xref>) and in humans, causing asthma.</p>
<p><italic>C. gynandra</italic> has become a weed of importance with its demand increasing, being used in different areas, including pharmaceuticals, culinary and traditional medicine, besides being a nutritious traditional leafy vegetable. <italic>C. gynandra&#x2019;s</italic> increase in demand has raised interest in working on the diseases that affect its growth, and the need to do commercial production of the plant in provinces of Zimbabwe, a new area of research to ensure its availability and reduce crop loss to diseases. <italic>Alternaria</italic> species has been identified through morphological, physiological and molecular characterisation during research at MUAST AIP Laboratory to identify pathogens that affect <italic>C. gynandra</italic> during the 2021&#x2013;2022 cropping season in Zimbabwe. Four areas were assessed. They included three provinces, that is, Mashonaland East Province&#x2019;s Marondera University of Agricultural Sciences and Technology, Dozmery area, Manicaland Province&#x2019;s Premier and Mutanda 2 areas, and Masvingo Province&#x2019;s Zimuto area. Differences in morphology, physiology and biochemical characteristics have shown that <italic>Alternaria</italic> has many species that are pathogenic to <italic>C. gynandra</italic> accessions in Zimbabwe. The effect of the pathogens on <italic>C. gynandra</italic> plants has not been evaluated and controlled, hence this research.</p>
<p>Quality and quantity of feed, food and fibre produced by farmers in the world need to be maintained by controlling plant diseases (Cwalina-Amboziak, Damszel &#x0026; Glosek-Sobieraj <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0004">2015</xref>). The use of chemical control methods was very effective in the past 100 years, but due to their residual effect in the environment causing pollution, the methods are being replaced by alternatives that are environmentally friendly, such as biological control (Cwalina-Amboziak et al. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0004">2015</xref>; Pal &#x0026; McSpadden Gardener <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0015">2006</xref>; Pandit et al. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0016">2022</xref>). Biological control agencies (BCA) have been used to manage pathogens that cause diseases on plants, and they are cheaper and environmentally friendly because they are available in the environment (Chandrashekara et al. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0003">2012</xref>).</p>
<p><italic>Alternaria</italic> species have been considered an important fungal species that is known to cause early blight disease. The management of pathogens that has been done before, where different plant pathogens have been controlled using Integrated Pest Management (IPM) options, has been successful (Kaliyati, Mapope &#x0026; Manyangarirwa <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0008">2023</xref>; Razdan, Gupta &#x0026; Peshin <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0018">2009</xref>). Diseases associated with <italic>Alternaria</italic> species have been managed effectively with the use of chemicals and biological control agents (Grondona et al. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0006">1997</xref>). <italic>Alternaria</italic> leaf spot management has been noted to have low efficacy when using fungicides (Scheufele <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0019">2013</xref>), hence the need to use different control methods in this research. This research is new in Zimbabwe, and it deployed synthetic fungicides, BCAs and organic control methods to control pathogens affecting <italic>C. gynandra</italic>. The use of BCAs has gained widespread acceptance as an alternative to the use of pesticides and pesticide resistance in the control of pathogens (Loona et al. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0010">2024</xref>; Pandit et al. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0016">2022</xref>), though there is still much to be done on their interaction with natural and societal functions to ensure their sustainable development and deployment of the approach for its endorsement (Loona et al. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0010">2024</xref>). Biological control agents can control pathogens, though they fail to permanently eradicate the pathogen (Chandrashekara et al. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0003">2012</xref>; Mahr, Whitaker &#x0026; Ridgway <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0011">2008</xref>). There are natural BCAs that survive in the plant and soil environment, which produce antibiotics (Alalade et al. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0002">2017</xref>; Pal &#x0026; McSpadden Gardener <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0015">2006</xref>). Sudden disease appearance under greenhouse conditions, leaving little or no room for farmers to take control action, leads to only the use of fungicides as a control measure (Scheufele <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0019">2013</xref>). The use of Metalaxyl in combination with Dithiocarbamates was shown to be an effective combination that can regulate the growth of fungi in plants (Panek, Helmer &#x0026; Ali <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0017">2022</xref>). The management of early blight diseases caused by <italic>Alternaria</italic> species has been shown to be low, around 60&#x0025; &#x2013; 70&#x0025; under field conditions (Kaliyati et al. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0008">2023</xref>). Acylalanine has been shown <italic>in vitro</italic> to reduce mycelial growth of <italic>A. alternata</italic> when applied at a rate of 2 kg/ha and had an efficacy rate of 49&#x0025;, while Dithiocarbamate at a rate of 2 kg/ha had 100&#x0025;. A combination of Mancozeb + carbedazim (0.2&#x0025;) was used on seed treatment and then foliar application and proved to be most effective in reducing disease intensity (Meena et al. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0013">2022</xref>). Terbuconazole, a Triazole fungicide, was also found to be effective in controlling <italic>Alternaria</italic> leaf blight both in <italic>in vitro</italic> and <italic>in vivo</italic> by inhibiting mycelial growth (100&#x0025;) and conidial germination (90.7&#x0025;), on Radish plants (Razdan et al. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0018">2009</xref>). A combination of terbuconazole and azoxystrobin was found to be effective in controlling Alternaria pori at 0.1&#x0025;, followed by pyraclostrobin + epoxiconazole at the same rate (Mushrif et al. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0014">2023</xref>). Biological control is one of the solutions that are now being researched as an alternative pathogen control (Alalade et al. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0002">2017</xref>; Torres et al. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0020">2017</xref>). <italic>Trichoderma</italic>, a BCA, has been widely used due to its ability to control pathogen growth and populations in crop production (Pandit et al. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0016">2022</xref>). <italic>Trichoderma harzianum</italic> was noted to reduce the incidence and seed infection of <italic>Alternaria</italic> species on <italic>Brassica</italic> seeds, thereby increasing seed emergence and decreasing leaf infections (Scheufele <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0019">2013</xref>).</p>
<p>The aim of this research was to isolate, evaluate and propose potential management options against the diseases caused by <italic>Alternaria alternata</italic> and <italic>Alternaria senecionicola</italic>, obtained and identified from Marondera University of Agricultural Sciences and Technology, Agro Industrial Park (MUAST AIP) and Premier areas, after a research that was conducted from three provinces of Zimbabwe, that is, Mashonaland East Province, MUAST AIP area, Manicaland Province Premier and Mutanda 2 areas, and Masvingo Province&#x2019;s Zimuto area. This research is new in Zimbabwe.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s0002">
<title>Research methods and design</title>
<sec id="s20003">
<title>Site</title>
<p>These trials were run in a greenhouse in Marondera at MUAST AIP.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s20004">
<title>Biological material</title>
<p>Fungi used in this research were isolated from three provinces of Zimbabwe during a survey to identify pathogens that affect <italic>C. gynandra</italic>. Mashonaland East Province MUAST AIP, Masvingo Province, Zimuto area, Manicaland Premier area and Mutanda area during the 2020/22 growing season. <italic>In vitro</italic> cultures of <italic>Alternaria alternata</italic> and <italic>Alternaria senecionicola</italic> were done on potato dextrose agar (PDA) and were placed in an incubator for 7 days at 25 &#x00B0;C + &#x2212;2 &#x00B0;C. The grown fungi were diluted to a concentration of 1 &#x00D7; 10<sup>&#x2212;6</sup> and used to inoculate 6-week-old greenhouse plants at a height of 15 cm.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s20005">
<title><italic>In vivo</italic> experiments</title>
<p><italic>In vitro</italic> experiments were conducted to test the efficacy of fungicides, BCAs and organic control agents against fungal isolates found to be pathogenic to <italic>C. gynandra</italic> accessions. The different concentrations were used to determine the minimum inhibitory concentrations that were later used in <italic>in vivo</italic> experiments under greenhouse conditions to control the effect of <italic>A. alternata</italic> and <italic>A. senecionicola</italic>.</p>
<p>Three trials were conducted in the greenhouse using fungicide concentrations that effectively controlled fungal growth on <italic>C. gynandra in vitro</italic>. The 6&#x002A;2 factorial experiment was laid out in a CRD, with three replications. The main plot had a chemical being tested, for example, triazole, against a pathogen inoculated on <italic>C. gynandra</italic> plants. 3 m &#x00D7; 1 m plots were used as the main plots with the same fungicide being applied on different isolates, each being replicated three times. The experiments were run in a greenhouse where a double layer of nap liner was used to block each main plot to prevent the drifting of chemicals to other plots.</p>
<p>The first trial was a 6&#x002A;2 factorial experiment laid out in a CRD, with three replications. The six factors consisted of chemical control agents at rates of 3760 ppm Triazole, 10 000 ppm Acylalanine, 2000 ppm Methyl Benzimidazol Carbamate (MBC), 8520 ppm Dithiocarbamate and 520 ppm Triadimenol, and 3760 ppm Pyraclostrobin+epoxiconazole, as indicated in <xref ref-type="table" rid="T0001">Table 1</xref>, whereas the two factors consisted of the two fungal pathogens, <italic>Alternaria alternata</italic> and <italic>Alternaria senecionicola</italic>. Plants inoculated with the two pathogens at a rate of 1 &#x00D7; 10<sup>&#x2212;6</sup> were sprayed with the fungicide from the day of inoculation. The second trial was a 3&#x002A;2 factorial (BCAs that included <italic>Trichoderma harzanium</italic> (T77) and <italic>Saccharomyces cerevisiae</italic> that were used at rates of 240 ppm and 11 000 ppm, as indicated in <xref ref-type="table" rid="T0002">Table 2</xref> and acylalanine control at 10 000 ppm on plants inoculated separately with <italic>A. alternata</italic> and <italic>A. senecionicola</italic>) experiment laid out in a CRD. Plants inoculated with the two pathogens at a rate of 1 &#x00D7; 10<sup>&#x2212;6</sup> were sprayed with the fungicide from the day of inoculation. The third trial was a 2&#x002A;2 factorial (Cattle bile was used at a rate of 5000 ppm as indicated in <xref ref-type="table" rid="T0003">Table 3</xref> and Acylalanine control at 10 000 ppm on plants inoculated separately with <italic>A. alternata</italic> and <italic>A. senecionicola</italic>) experiment laid in a CRD. Plants inoculated with the two pathogens at a rate of 1 &#x00D7; 10<sup>&#x2212;6</sup> were sprayed with the fungicide from the day of inoculation.</p>
<table-wrap id="T0001">
<label>TABLE 1</label>
<caption><p>Fungicide groups used in <italic>in vivo</italic> experiments.</p></caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th valign="top" align="left">FRAC group code</th>
<th valign="top" align="left">Group name</th>
<th valign="top" align="left">Chemical name</th>
<th valign="top" align="left">Common name</th>
<th valign="top" align="left">Dosage</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="left">1</td>
<td align="left">Methyl benzimidazol carbamate (MBC)</td>
<td align="left">-</td>
<td align="left">Benomyl</td>
<td align="left">2000 ppm</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">3</td>
<td align="left">Demethylation inhibitor (DMI): SBI Class 1</td>
<td align="left">Triazole</td>
<td align="left">Terbuconazole</td>
<td align="left">3700 ppm</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">M03</td>
<td align="left">Dithiocarbamate</td>
<td align="left">Dithiocarbamate</td>
<td align="left">Mancozeb</td>
<td align="left">8520 ppm</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">M03+ 4</td>
<td align="left">Phenylamide-Acylamide + Dithiocarbamate</td>
<td align="left">Acylalanine</td>
<td align="left">Mancozeb + metalaxyl</td>
<td align="left">10 000 ppm</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left"></td>
<td align="left">Triadimenol</td>
<td align="left">-</td>
<td align="left">Shavit</td>
<td align="left">570 ppm</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">11</td>
<td align="left">Methoxy-carbamate</td>
<td align="left">Pyraclostrobin + epoxiconazole</td>
<td align="left">Opera</td>
<td align="left">3760 ppm</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn><p><italic>Source</italic>: Adopted from Fungicide Resistance Action Committee (FRAC), 2023, <italic>FRAC Code List, 2023: Fungal control agents sorted by cross-resistance pattern and mode of action (including coding for FRAC Groups on product labels)</italic>, Scribd, pp. 1&#x2013;18, viewed n.d., from <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://www.scribd.com/document/696613793/frac-code-list-2023-final">https://www.scribd.com/document/696613793/frac-code-list-2023-final</ext-link>.</p></fn>
<fn><p>FRAC, Fungicide resistance action committee.</p></fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
<table-wrap id="T0002">
<label>TABLE 2</label>
<caption><p>Biological control agents used in <italic>in vivo</italic> experiments.</p></caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th valign="top" align="left">FRAC group code</th>
<th valign="top" align="left">Group name</th>
<th valign="top" align="left">Chemical name</th>
<th valign="top" align="left">Common name</th>
<th valign="top" align="left">Dosage</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="left">BM02</td>
<td align="left">Biological agent (BAC)</td>
<td align="left">Fungal</td>
<td align="left"><italic>Trichoderma harzanium</italic></td>
<td align="left">240 ppm</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">P06, BM02</td>
<td align="left">Biological agent (BCA)</td>
<td align="left">Fungal</td>
<td align="left"><italic>Saccharomyces cerevisiae</italic> (Yeast)</td>
<td align="left">11 000 ppm</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn><p><italic>Source</italic>: Adopted from Fungicide Resistance Action Committee (FRAC), 2023, <italic>FRAC Code List, 2023: Fungal control agents sorted by cross-resistance pattern and mode of action (including coding for FRAC Groups on product labels)</italic>, Scribd, pp. 1&#x2013;18, viewed n.d., from <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://www.scribd.com/document/696613793/frac-code-list-2023-final">https://www.scribd.com/document/696613793/frac-code-list-2023-final</ext-link>.</p></fn>
<fn><p>FRAC, Fungicide resistance action committee; BCA, biological control agencies.</p></fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
<table-wrap id="T0003">
<label>TABLE 3</label>
<caption><p>Biopesticide agent used in <italic>in vivo</italic> experiments.</p></caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th valign="top" align="left">Group code</th>
<th valign="top" align="left">Chemical ingredient</th>
<th valign="top" align="left">Group name</th>
<th valign="top" align="left">Chemical name</th>
<th valign="top" align="left">Common name</th>
<th valign="top" align="left">Dosage</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="left">NC</td>
<td align="left">Bile salts</td>
<td align="left">Bio pesticide</td>
<td align="left">Organic</td>
<td align="left">Cattle bile</td>
<td align="left">5000 ppm</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn><p><italic>Source</italic>: Adopted from Fungicide Resistance Action Committee (FRAC), 2023, <italic>FRAC Code List, 2023: Fungal control agents sorted by cross-resistance pattern and mode of action (including coding for FRAC Groups on product labels)</italic>, Scribd, pp. 1&#x2013;18, viewed n.d., from <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://www.scribd.com/document/696613793/frac-code-list-2023-final">https://www.scribd.com/document/696613793/frac-code-list-2023-final</ext-link>.</p></fn>
<fn><p>FRAC, Fungicide resistance action committee.</p></fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
</sec>
<sec id="s20006">
<title>Data collection</title>
<sec id="s30007">
<title>In planta experiment</title>
<p>After inoculation and spraying, data were collected every 7 days for 21 days, with disease incidence and severity scores being recorded for every inoculated plant.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="s20008">
<title>Data analysis</title>
<p>Normality tests were conducted on incidence and severity scores using the Shapiro-Wilk test through SPSS. The data that did not fit normality were Log10(x + 1) transformed (Malato <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0012">2023</xref>) before subjecting them to analysis of variance using GenStat version 18. Severity data collected were used to calculate Area Under Disease Progress Curve (AUDPC) using Excel formula (day7 + day14)&#x002A;7/2 for all the weeks, disease incidence data collected were Arc SIN transformed using Excel, and the data were subjected to a two-way analysis of variance using GenStat 18th edition at 5&#x0025; significance.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s20009">
<title>Ethical considerations</title>
<p>This article followed all ethical standards for research without direct contact with human or animal subjects.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="s0010">
<title>Results</title>
<p><xref ref-type="table" rid="T0004">Table 4</xref> presents results with AUDPCs and &#x0025; disease incidence scores that did not fit normality tests, hence were transformed accordingly. On analysis of variance, there was a significant interaction between fungicide and fungal pathogens on AUDPC on day 7&#x2013;14 interactions <italic>p</italic> &#x003C; 0.02, while there was no significant interaction on day 14&#x2013;21 <italic>p</italic> = 0.07. There were significant interactions on &#x0025; disease incidences for day 7, with <italic>p</italic> = 0.009, day 14, <italic>p</italic> = 0.04, and day 21, <italic>p</italic> = 0.04.</p>
<table-wrap id="T0004">
<label>TABLE 4</label>
<caption><p>Response on disease severity as area under disease progress curve for chemical control (fungicides) on isolated pathogens on <italic>Cleome gynandra</italic> plants.</p></caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th valign="top" align="left">Treatment</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">AUDPC day 7&#x2013;14</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">AUDPC day 14&#x2013;21</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">&#x0025; disease incidence day 7</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">&#x0025; disease incidence day 14</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">&#x0025; disease incidence day 21</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="left" colspan="6"><bold>Fungicide</bold></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Pyraclostrobin + epoxiconazole</td>
<td align="center">7.1 (1.8)<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center">7.1 (1.8)<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center">5.7 (0.0)<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center">6 (9.0)<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center">6.3 (16.4)<sup>a</sup></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Triazole</td>
<td align="center">7.1 (1.8)<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center">7.1 (1.8)<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center">5.7 (0.0)<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center">6.3 (16.4)<sup>ab</sup></td>
<td align="center">6 (9.0)<sup>a</sup></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Methyl benzimidazol carbamate (MBC)</td>
<td align="center">7.2 (3.5)<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center">7.2 (3.5)<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center">7.3 (35.0)<sup>c</sup></td>
<td align="center">7.1 (29.9)<sup>b</sup></td>
<td align="center">7.3 (35.0)<sup>b</sup></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Acylalanine (control)</td>
<td align="center">7.3 (7.0)<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center">7.5 (14.0)<sup>b</sup></td>
<td align="center">5.7 (0.0)<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center">7.3 (35.0)<sup>b</sup></td>
<td align="center">7.1 (29.9)<sup>b</sup></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Triadimenol</td>
<td align="center">7.3 (7.0)<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center">7.5 (14.0)<sup>b</sup></td>
<td align="center">5.7 (0.0)<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center">7.3 (35.0)<sup>b</sup></td>
<td align="center">7.3 (35.0)<sup>b</sup></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Dithiocarbamate</td>
<td align="center">7.9 (22.8)<sup>b</sup></td>
<td align="center">7.8 (21.0)<sup>c</sup></td>
<td align="center">6.3 (16.4)<sup>b</sup></td>
<td align="center">6.8 (23.3)<sup>b</sup></td>
<td align="center">6.3 (16.4)<sup>a</sup></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Control</td>
<td align="center">7.9 (22.8)<sup>b</sup></td>
<td align="center">7.9 (22.8)<sup>c</sup></td>
<td align="center">7.3 (35.0)<sup>c</sup></td>
<td align="center">7.3 (35.0)<sup>b</sup></td>
<td align="center">7.3 (35.0)<sup>b</sup></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Chemical <italic>p</italic>-value</td>
<td align="center">&#x003C; 0.001</td>
<td align="center">&#x003C; 0.001</td>
<td align="center">&#x003C; 0.001</td>
<td align="center">&#x003C; 0.001</td>
<td align="center">&#x003C; 0.001</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">LSD chemical</td>
<td align="center">0.2</td>
<td align="center">0.2</td>
<td align="center">0.3</td>
<td align="center">0.6</td>
<td align="center">0.6</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" colspan="6"><bold>Species</bold></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left"><italic>Alternaria alternata</italic></td>
<td align="center">7.2 (3.5)<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center">7.3 (7.0)<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center">6.8 (23.3)<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center">6.7 (22.0)<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center">6.8 (23.3)<sup>a</sup></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left"><italic>Alternaria senecionicola</italic></td>
<td align="center">7.4 (10.5)<sup>b</sup></td>
<td align="center">7.4 (10.5)<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center">6.8 (23.3)<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center">6.9 (26.6)<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center">6.6 (20.6)<sup>a</sup></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Pathogen <italic>p</italic>-value</td>
<td align="center">0.006</td>
<td align="center">0.070</td>
<td align="center">0.060</td>
<td align="center">0.300</td>
<td align="center">0.300</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">LSD pathogen</td>
<td align="center">0.1</td>
<td align="center">0.1</td>
<td align="center">0.2</td>
<td align="center">0.4</td>
<td align="center">0.4</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Chemical&#x002A;pathogen (<italic>p</italic>-value)</td>
<td align="center">0.020</td>
<td align="center">0.070</td>
<td align="center">0.009</td>
<td align="center">0.040</td>
<td align="center">0.040</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">CV&#x0025;</td>
<td align="center">2.0</td>
<td align="center">2.4</td>
<td align="center">4.4</td>
<td align="center">7.9</td>
<td align="center">8.0</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Grand mean</td>
<td align="center">7.3</td>
<td align="center">7.4</td>
<td align="center">6.1</td>
<td align="center">6.8</td>
<td align="center">6.7</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn><p>Note: Means denoted by same letters are not significantly different at (<italic>p</italic> &#x003C; 0.05). Log10(x+1) or arcsine transformed means are not in brackets.</p></fn>
<fn><p>AUDPC, area under disease progress curve; LSD, least significant difference; CV, coefficient of variation.</p></fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
<p>On mean separation, there were significant differences on fungicide action on controlling the pathogens on days 7&#x2013;14 AUDPCs <italic>p</italic> &#x003C; 0.001, where Diathiocarbamate and the control were having the highest AUDPC = 7.9 (70&#x0025; disease severity) against the rest of the fungicides that are not significantly different from each other, where Pyraclostroblin + epoxyconazole and Triazole had AUDPC = 7.1 (10&#x0025; disease severity) and MBC had AUDPC = 7.2 (15&#x0025; disease severity), and both Acylalanine (control) and Triademenol had AUDPC = 7.3 (20&#x0025; disease severity).</p>
<p>Days 14&#x2013;21, fungicide action was significant, with <italic>p</italic> &#x003C; 0.001. Pyroclostrobin + epoxiconazole, Triazole and MBC were not significantly different, with AUDPCs of 7.1 (10&#x0025; disease severity), 7.1 (10&#x0025; disease severity), and 7.2 (15&#x0025; disease severity), respectively, whilst both Acylalanine (control) and Triademinol had AUDPCs of 7.5 (35&#x0025; disease severity) and were not significantly different. Dithiocarbamate and the control had the highest AUDPC of 7.8 (60&#x0025; disease severity) and 7.9 (70&#x0025; disease severity), respectively, and they were significantly different from the rest of the fungicides.</p>
<p>On &#x0025; disease incidences, the fungicides were significantly different, with <italic>p</italic> &#x003C; 0.001, where Pyraclostrobin + epoxiconazole, Triazole, Acylalanine (control) and Triademinol had 5.7&#x0025; (0&#x0025; disease incidence), followed by Diathiocarbamate being equal to 6.3&#x0025;, which was significantly different, and lastly MBC and the control had the highest incidence of 7.3&#x0025; (100&#x0025; disease incidence). On day 14, the &#x0025; disease incidence was significantly different, with <italic>p</italic> &#x003C; 0.001, where Pyraclostrobin + epoxiconazole and Triazole were not significantly different from each other, at had 6&#x0025; and 6.3&#x0025;, respectively, whilst Triazole, MBC, Acylalanine (control), Triademinol, Dithiocarbamate and control were not significantly different, with &#x0025; incidences of 6.3&#x0025;, 7.1&#x0025;, 7.3&#x0025;, 7.3&#x0025;, 6.8&#x0025; and 7.3&#x0025;, respectively.</p>
<p>On day 21, there was a significant difference, with <italic>p</italic> &#x003C; 0.001. Pyraclostrobin+epoxiconazole, Triazole and Dithiocarbamate had the least &#x0025; disease incidences of 6.3&#x0025;, 6&#x0025; and 6.3&#x0025;, respectively, whilst MBC, Acylalanine (control), Triademenol, and control had no significant difference, with disease incidences of 7.3&#x0025;, 7.1&#x0025;, 7.3&#x0025; and 7.3&#x0025;, respectively (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F0001">Figure 1</xref>).</p>
<fig id="F0001">
<label>FIGURE 1</label>
<caption><p>Interactive effect of Synthetic fungicides and <italic>Alternaria</italic> species on disease incidence (&#x0025;) day 21 at Agro Industrial Park, Marondera University of Agricultural Sciences and Technology 2023.</p></caption>
<graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="JUCR-5-42-g001.tif"/>
</fig>
<p>Fungal pathogens&#x2019; response to fungicide treatment was only significant on days 7&#x2013;14 AUDPCs, with <italic>A. alternata</italic> being the least, with 7.2 (15&#x0025; disease severity), and <italic>A. senecionicola</italic> had a higher AUDPC of 7.4 (20&#x0025; disease severity). &#x0025; disease incidences were not significant throughout the research period.</p>
<p><xref ref-type="table" rid="T0005">Table 5</xref> results had the AUDPCs and disease incidence scores not fitting normality tests, hence were transformed accordingly. On analysis of variance, there were no significant interactions between BCAs and fungal pathogens on AUDPCs days 7&#x2013;14, with <italic>p</italic> = 0.6 and on days 14&#x2013;21 <italic>p</italic> = 0.2.</p>
<table-wrap id="T0005">
<label>TABLE 5</label>
<caption><p>Response to disease severity as area under disease progress curve for Biological Control Agents against a chemical control on isolated pathogens on <italic>Cleome gynandra</italic> plants.</p></caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th valign="top" align="left">Treatment</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">AUDPC day 7&#x2013;14</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">AUDPC day 14&#x2013;21</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">&#x0025; disease incidence day 7</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">&#x0025; disease incidence day 14</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">&#x0025; disease incidence day 21</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="left" colspan="6"><bold>BCAs</bold></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left"><italic>Saccharomyces cerevisiae</italic></td>
<td align="center">7 (0.0)<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center">7 (0.0)<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center">5.7 (0.0)<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center">6.3 (16.4)<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center">5.7 (0.0)<sup>a</sup></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Acylalanine (control)</td>
<td align="center">7.1 (1.8)<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center">7.2 (3.5)<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center">5.7 (0.0)<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center">6.5 (19.2)<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center">6.3 (16.4)<sup>a</sup></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left"><italic>Trichoderma harzianum</italic> (T77)</td>
<td align="center">7.4 (10.5)<sup>b</sup></td>
<td align="center">7.5 (14.0)<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center">6.5 (19.2)<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center">7.1 (29.9)<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center">6.8 (23.3)<sup>a</sup></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Control</td>
<td align="center">7.9 (22.8)<sup>b</sup></td>
<td align="center">7.9 (22.8)<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center">7.3 (35.0)<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center">7.3 (35.0)<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center">7.3 (35.0)<sup>a</sup></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left"><italic>p</italic>-value chemical</td>
<td align="center">&#x003C; 0.001</td>
<td align="center">0.100</td>
<td align="center">0.000</td>
<td align="center">0.100</td>
<td align="center">0.050</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">LSD chemical</td>
<td align="center">0.1</td>
<td align="center">0.3</td>
<td align="center">0.0</td>
<td align="center">0.7</td>
<td align="center">0.7</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" colspan="6"><bold>Species</bold></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left"><italic>Alternaria alternate</italic></td>
<td align="center">7.2 (3.5)<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center">7.1 (1.8)<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center">6.3 (16.4)<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center">6.3 (16.4)<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center">6.1 (12.0)<sup>a</sup></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left"><italic>Alternaria senecionicola</italic></td>
<td align="center">7.2 (3.5)<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center">7.4 (10.5)<sup>b</sup></td>
<td align="center">5.7 (0.0)<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center">7.1 (29.9)<sup>b</sup></td>
<td align="center">6.5 (19.2)<sup>a</sup></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Pathogen <italic>p</italic>-value</td>
<td align="center">0.200</td>
<td align="center">0.003</td>
<td align="center">0.000</td>
<td align="center">0.100</td>
<td align="center">0.300</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">LSD Pathogen</td>
<td align="center">0.1</td>
<td align="center">0.2</td>
<td align="center">0.0</td>
<td align="center">0.7</td>
<td align="center">0.7</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Chemical&#x002A;Pathogen (<italic>p</italic>-value)</td>
<td align="center">0.600</td>
<td align="center">0.200</td>
<td align="center">0.000</td>
<td align="center">0.100</td>
<td align="center">0.300</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">CV&#x0025;</td>
<td align="center">1.6</td>
<td align="center">2.8</td>
<td align="center">0.0</td>
<td align="center">9.9</td>
<td align="center">10.4</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Grand mean</td>
<td align="center">7.2</td>
<td align="center">7.3</td>
<td align="center">6.0</td>
<td align="center">6.6</td>
<td align="center">6.3</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn><p>Note: Means denoted by same letters are not significantly different at (<italic>p</italic> &#x003C; 0.05). Log10(x+1) or arcsine transformed means are not in brackets.</p></fn>
<fn><p>AUDPC, area under disease progress curve; BCA, Biological control agencies; LSD, least significant difference; CV, coefficient of variation.</p></fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
<p>On disease incidences, there was no significance during the research on day 7 <italic>p</italic> = 0, day 14 <italic>p</italic> = 0.1, and day 21, <italic>p</italic> = 0.3. On mean separation there were significant differences on AUDPCs on days 7&#x2013;14, with <italic>p</italic> &#x003C; 0.001, where <italic>S. cerevisiae</italic> and Acylalanine control were not significantly different, with 7 (0&#x0025; disease severity) and 7.1 (10&#x0025; disease severity), respectively, whilst <italic>T. harzianum</italic> (T77) had a higher AUDPC of 7.4 (30&#x0025; disease severity), followed by the control with 7.9 (70&#x0025; disease severity).</p>
<p>On days 14&#x2013;21, there was no significant difference for all the BCAs and the control. On &#x0025; disease incidence for day 7, 14, and 21, there was no significant difference, with <italic>p</italic> = 0, 0.1 and 0.05, respectively. Fungal pathogen responses on AUDPCs were not significantly different for days 7&#x2013;14 evaluations, whilst significance was noted on days 14&#x2013;21, with <italic>p</italic> = 0.003 and <italic>A. alternata</italic> having an AUDPC of 7.1 (10&#x0025; disease severity), whilst <italic>A. senecionicola</italic> had a higher AUDPC of 7.4 (30&#x0025; disease severity).</p>
<p>On &#x0025; disease incidence, there was no significance throughout the research for days 7, 14 and 21, with <italic>p</italic> = 0, 0.1, 0.3, respectively.</p>
<p>From <xref ref-type="table" rid="T0006">Table 6</xref>, the AUDPCs and &#x0025; disease incidence scores did not fit normality tests, hence were transformed accordingly. On analysis of variance, there were no significant interactions between organic control and fungal pathogens on AUDPCs days 7&#x2013;14, with <italic>p</italic> = 0.2 and days 14&#x2013;21 <italic>p</italic> = 0.4.</p>
<table-wrap id="T0006">
<label>TABLE 6</label>
<caption><p>Response to disease severity as area under the disease progress curve for cattle bile against a chemical control on isolated pathogens on <italic>Cleome gynandra</italic> plants.</p></caption>
<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
<thead>
<tr>
<th valign="top" align="left">Treatment</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">AUDPC day 7&#x2013;14</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">AUDPC day 14&#x2013;21</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">&#x0025; disease incidence day 7</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">&#x0025; disease incidence day 14</th>
<th valign="top" align="center">&#x0025; disease incidence day 21</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="left" colspan="6"><bold>Organic control agents</bold></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Acylalanine (control)</td>
<td align="center">7.3 (7.0)<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center">7.5 (14.0)<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center">5.7 (0.0)<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center">6.5 (19.5)<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center">6.3 (16.4)<sup>a</sup></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Cattle bile</td>
<td align="center">7.2 (3.5)<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center">7.2 (3.5)<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center">6 (9.0)<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center">6.8 (23.3)<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center">5.7 (0.0)<sup>a</sup></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Control</td>
<td align="center">7.9 (22.8)<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center">7.9 (22.8)<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center">7.3 (35.0)<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center">7.3 (35.0)<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center">7.3 (35.0)<sup>a</sup></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left"><italic>p</italic>-value chemical</td>
<td align="center">0.40</td>
<td align="center">0.05</td>
<td align="center">0.30</td>
<td align="center">0.30</td>
<td align="center">0.08</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">LSD chemical</td>
<td align="center">0.3</td>
<td align="center">0.3</td>
<td align="center">0.6</td>
<td align="center">0.6</td>
<td align="center">0.6</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left" colspan="6"><bold>Species</bold></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left"><italic>Alternaria alternate</italic></td>
<td align="center">7.3 (7.0)<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center">7.4 (10.5)<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center">6 (9.0)<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center">6.5 (19.2)<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center">5.7 (0.0)<sup>a</sup></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left"><italic>Alternaria senecionicola</italic></td>
<td align="center">7.2 (3.5)<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center">7.3 (7.0)<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center">5.7 (0.0)<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center">6.8 (23.3)<sup>a</sup></td>
<td align="center">6.3 (16.4)<sup>a</sup></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Pathogen <italic>p</italic>-value</td>
<td align="center">0.400</td>
<td align="center">0.700</td>
<td align="center">0.300</td>
<td align="center">0.300</td>
<td align="center">0.080</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">LSD pathogen</td>
<td align="center">0.3</td>
<td align="center">0.3</td>
<td align="center">0.6</td>
<td align="center">0.6</td>
<td align="center">0.6</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Chemical&#x002A;pathogen (<italic>p</italic>-value)</td>
<td align="center">0.200</td>
<td align="center">0.400</td>
<td align="center">0.300</td>
<td align="center">0.001</td>
<td align="center">0.080</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">CV&#x0025;</td>
<td align="center">2.8</td>
<td align="center">3.3</td>
<td align="center">7.9</td>
<td align="center">6.9</td>
<td align="center">7.7</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Grand mean</td>
<td align="center">7.2</td>
<td align="center">7.3</td>
<td align="center">5.9</td>
<td align="center">6.7</td>
<td align="center">6.0</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table-wrap-foot>
<fn><p>Note: Means denoted by same letters are not significantly different at (<italic>p</italic> &#x003C; 0.05). Log10(x+1) or arcsine transformed means are not in brackets.</p></fn>
<fn><p>AUDPC, area under disease progress curve; LSD, least significant difference; CV, coefficient of variation.</p></fn>
</table-wrap-foot>
</table-wrap>
<p>On disease incidences, there was no significance during the research on day 7 <italic>p</italic> = 0.3, and there was significance on day 14 <italic>p</italic> = 0.001, and no significance on day 21, <italic>p</italic> = 0.08. On mean separation, there were no significant differences on AUDPCs on days 7&#x2013;14, with <italic>p</italic> = 0.4. On days 14&#x2013;21, there was no significant difference <italic>p</italic> = 0.05. On &#x0025; disease incidence for days 7, 14 and 21, there was no significant difference, with <italic>p</italic> = 0.3, 0.3 and 0.08, respectively.</p>
<p>Fungal pathogen responses on AUDPCs were not significantly different for days 7&#x2013;14 and 14&#x2013;21 evaluations, with <italic>p</italic> = 0.4 and 0.7. On &#x0025; disease incidence, there was no significance throughout the research for days 7, 14 and 21, with <italic>p</italic> = 0.3, 0.3, 0.08, respectively.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s0011">
<title>Discussion</title>
<p><italic>Alternaria</italic> species has been considered an important fungal species that is known to cause early blight disease (He et al. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0007">2021</xref>). The control of pathogens that has been done before involved different plant pathogens that have been controlled using IPM options, and the control has been successful (He et al. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0007">2021</xref>). This was observed to complement the results obtained during this research, where the trials (fungicide, BCAs, and organic) were successful in controlling the isolates on <italic>C. gynandra</italic>. Observations made during this research have shown that chemical treatments were able to control the two pathogens from the two provinces of Zimbabwe. <italic>Alternaria alternata</italic> and <italic>Alternaria senecionicola</italic>, which have been found to affect <italic>C. gynandra</italic> were successfully controlled by Triazole, Triademinol, Pyraclostrobin+epoxiconazole, and MBC. Acylalanine was able to control the pathogen establishment on the <italic>C. gynandra</italic> plants by keeping disease severity low, below 30&#x0025;. Dithiocarbamate was used and was found not to be very effective, having a disease severity of 80&#x0025;. Triazole, Triademinol, Pyroclostrobin+epoxiconazole, MBC are the most effective in the control of <italic>Alternaria alternata</italic> by keeping the pathogen below 10&#x0025; of the disease severity. In another research, a combination of terbuconazole and azoxystrobin was found to be effective in controlling <italic>Alternaria</italic> pori at 0.1&#x0025;, followed by pyraclostrobin + epoxiconazole at the same rate (Mushrif et al. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0014">2023</xref>). Terbuconazole, a triazole fungicide, was also found to be effective in controlling <italic>Alternaria</italic> leaf blight both in <italic>in vitro</italic> and <italic>in vivo</italic> by inhibiting mycelial growth (100&#x0025;) and conidial germination (90.7&#x0025;) (Razdan et al. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0018">2009</xref>), which approves the results found in this research. The use of metalaxyl in combination with Dithiocarbamates was shown to be an effective combination that can regulate the growth of fungi in plants (Panek et al. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0017">2022</xref>). In this research, Acylalanine is a combination of Phenylamide-Acylamide + Dithiocarbamate, which is traded as Mancozeb and Metalaxyl. The management of early blight diseases caused by <italic>Alternaria</italic> species has been shown to be low, around 60&#x0025; &#x2013; 70&#x0025; under field conditions (He et al. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0007">2021</xref>). In this study, Acylalanine had a similar suppressive ability of the two species of the <italic>C. gynandra</italic> plants. Similarly, Acylalanine, which has been shown to reduce mycelial growth of <italic>A. alternata</italic> when applied at a rate of 2 kg/ha, had an efficacy rate of 49&#x0025;, while Dithiocarbamate at a rate of 2 kg/ha had 100&#x0025; effectiveness, yet in this research it was observed that both treatments that were managed under Acylalanine and Dithiocarbamate had some instances where there was total eradication and in some it was not complete. Observations of unsatisfactory fungicide efficacy are attributed to application of less efficient products, their late application and maybe composition of <italic>Alternaria</italic> populations in different regions (He et al. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0007">2021</xref>).</p>
<p>Dithiocarbamate is a protectant fungicide which prevents the establishment of the pathogen under natural conditions. In this research, it has proved to be ineffective since the application of the fungicide and inoculation were done at the same time. Therefore, the fungi were able to successfully establish on the <italic>C. gynandra</italic> plants.</p>
<p>Application of <italic>Trichoderma harzianum</italic> (T77) and <italic>Saccharomyces cerevisiae</italic> may have suppressed disease incidence and AUDPCs through antagonistic and exclusion means (Grondona et al. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0006">1997</xref>). <italic>T. harzianum</italic> and <italic>S. cerevicae</italic> were noted to control <italic>A. alternata</italic> as a biological control on lemon fruits as a pathogen of post-harvest rot (Troncos-Rojas &#x0026; Tiznado-Hernandez <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0021">2014</xref>). The effect of different species of <italic>T. harzianum</italic> proved to be very effective in the management of the targeted fungi (He et al. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0007">2021</xref>). <italic>Trichoderma harzianum</italic> was noted to reduce the incidence and seed infection of <italic>Alternaria</italic> species on <italic>Brassica</italic> seeds, thereby increasing seed emergence and decreasing leaf infections (Scheufele <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0019">2013</xref>). This agrees with the results obtained in this research, where the targeted fungal pathogens have been controlled by <italic>T. harzianum</italic> (T77), as it has antagonistic action and exclusion on the growth of the fungi.</p>
<p>Organic control success was found in the use of cattle bile, which inhibited the growth of the <italic>Alternaria</italic> species. Organic control using cattle bile has been effective in the control of the <italic>Alternaria</italic> species, as it has been observed to have been without significant difference to the effect of Acylalanine, a fungicide which is well known to be effective in the management of the <italic>Alternaria</italic> species (Kaliyati et al. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="CIT0008">2023</xref>) throughout the evaluation period.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s0012">
<title>Conclusion</title>
<p>In this new research conducted in Zimbabwe, <italic>Alternaria alternata</italic> and <italic>Alternaria senecionicola</italic>, which have been found to affect <italic>C. gynandra</italic>, were successfully controlled by Triazole, Acylalanine, Triademinol, Pyraclostrobin+epoxiconazole, and MBC, which were significantly superior in controlling the pathogens, followed by Dithiocarbamate. Biological control was successful with the use of <italic>Trichoderma harzanium</italic> (T77) and <italic>Saccharomyces cerevisiae</italic>, and they were found to be competitive as the control Acylalanine in their performance. Organic control success was found in the use of cattle bile, which was significant as acylalanine, which was used as the control during the research. Integrated pest management will be beneficial in the control of pathogens to reduce resistance due to the continual use of chemical fungicides. <italic>C. gynandra</italic> production will be managed at least with the control of pathogens to ensure success in the expected yield. Research should be ongoing to establish the presence of more different <italic>Alternaria</italic> species and more control treatments that can manage the current pathogens and many more in the production of <italic>C. gynandra</italic>.</p>
</sec>
</body>
<back>
<ack>
<title>Acknowledgements</title>
<p>I acknowledge the funding I received from the Government of Zimbabwe through the Ministry of Higher and Tertiary Education to conduct my research to fulfil my PhD studies at the Marondera University of Agricultural Sciences and Technology.</p>
<p>This article is based on research originally conducted as part of Joyce R. Kaliyati&#x2019;s doctoral thesis titled &#x2018;Fungal disease management in Cleome gynandra&#x2019;, submitted to the Department of Crop Science, Faculty of Plant and Animal Sciences Technology, Marondera University of Agricultural Sciences and Technology in 2026. The thesis is currently unpublished and not publicly available. The thesis was supervised by Nyamande Mapope and Walter Manyangarirwa. The thesis was reworked, revised and adapted into a journal article for publication. The author confirms that the content has not been previously published or disseminated and complies with ethical standards for original publication.</p>
<p>This article is based on data from a larger study. Another article was published from the same thesis. The article focuses on A review of Disease Management in <italic>Cleome gynandra, which</italic> has been published in the <italic>International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology</italic>, Volume 8, Issue 7. This article is accessible here: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8304414">https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8304414</ext-link></p>
<sec id="s20013" sec-type="COI-statement">
<title>Competing interests</title>
<p>The author reported that they received funding from the Ministry of Higher and Tertiary Education, Innovation, Science and Technology Development, Zimbabwe, which may be affected by the research reported in the enclosed publication. The author has disclosed those interests fully and has implemented an approved plan for managing any potential conflicts arising from their involvement. The terms of these funding arrangements have been reviewed and approved by the affiliated University in accordance with its policy on objectivity in research.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s20014">
<title>CRediT authorship contribution</title>
<p>Joyce R. Kaliyati: Conceptualisation, Methodology, Formal analysis, Investigation, Writing &#x2013; original draft, Visualisation, Project administration, Software, Data curation, Resources, Writing &#x2013; review &#x0026; editing, Funding acquisition. Nyamande Mapope: Formal analysis, Writing &#x2013; original draft, Visualisation, Project administration, Writing &#x2013; review &#x0026; editing, Supervision. Walter Manyangarirwa: Formal analysis, Visualisation, Project administration, Software, Writing &#x2013; review &#x0026; editing, Supervision. All authors reviewed the article, contributed to the discussion of results, approved the final version for submission and publication, and take responsibility for the integrity of its findings.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s20015" sec-type="data-availability">
<title>Data availability</title>
<p>The authors confirm that the data supporting the findings of this study are available within the article.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="s20016">
<title>Disclaimer</title>
<p>The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the authors and are the product of professional research. They do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of any affiliated institution, funder, agency, or that of the publisher. The authors are responsible for this article&#x2019;s results, findings, and content.</p>
</sec>
</ack>
<ref-list id="references">
<title>References</title>
<ref id="CIT0001"><mixed-citation publication-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Agrios</surname>, <given-names>G</given-names></string-name></person-group>., <year>2005</year>, <source><italic>Plant pathology</italic></source>, <edition>5th</edition> edn., <publisher-name>Elsevier Inc</publisher-name>, <publisher-loc>Oxford</publisher-loc>.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="CIT0002"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Alalade</surname>, <given-names>O.A</given-names></string-name>., <string-name><surname>Matanmi</surname>, <given-names>B</given-names></string-name>., <string-name><surname>Olaoye</surname>, <given-names>I</given-names></string-name>., <string-name><surname>Adegoke</surname>, <given-names>B</given-names></string-name>. &#x0026; <string-name><surname>Olaitan</surname>, <given-names>T</given-names></string-name></person-group>., <year>2017</year>, &#x2018;<article-title>Assessment of pests control methods and its perceived effect on agricultural production among famers in Kwara State, Nigeria</article-title>&#x2019;, <source><italic>Agro-Science</italic></source> <volume>16</volume>(<issue>1</issue>), <fpage>42</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>47</lpage>. <comment><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.4314/as.v16i1.8">https://doi.org/10.4314/as.v16i1.8</ext-link></comment></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="CIT0003"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Chandrashekara</surname>, <given-names>K.N</given-names></string-name>., <string-name><surname>Manivannan</surname>, <given-names>S</given-names></string-name>., <string-name><surname>Chandrashekara</surname>, <given-names>C</given-names></string-name>. &#x0026; <string-name><surname>Chakaravarthi</surname>, <given-names>M</given-names></string-name></person-group>., <year>2012</year>, &#x2018;<article-title>Biological control of plant diseases</article-title>&#x2019;, in <source><italic>Eco-friendly innovative approaches in plant disease management</italic></source>, pp. <fpage>148</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>167</lpage>, <comment>viewed 22 October 2023, from, <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://www.researchgate.net/publication/233119112">https://www.researchgate.net/publication/233119112</ext-link></comment></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="CIT0004"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Cwalina-Amboziak</surname>, <given-names>B</given-names></string-name>., <string-name><surname>Damszel</surname>, <given-names>M.M</given-names></string-name>. &#x0026; <string-name><surname>Glosek-Sobieraj</surname>, <given-names>M</given-names></string-name></person-group>., <year>2015</year>, &#x2018;<article-title>The effect of biological and chemical control agents on the health status of the very early potato cultivar Rosara</article-title>&#x2019;, <source><italic>Journal of Plant Protection Research</italic></source> <volume>55</volume>(<issue>4</issue>), <fpage>389</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>395</lpage>. <comment><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1515/jppr-2015-0052">https://doi.org/10.1515/jppr-2015-0052</ext-link></comment></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="CIT0005"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><collab>Fungicide Resistance Action Committee (FRAC)</collab></person-group>, <year>2023</year>, <source><italic>FRAC Code List, 2023: Fungal control agents sorted by cross-resistance pattern and mode of action (including coding for FRAC Groups on product labels)</italic></source>, Scribd, pp. <fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>18</lpage>, <comment>viewed n.d., from <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://www.scribd.com/document/696613793/frac-code-list-2023-final">https://www.scribd.com/document/696613793/frac-code-list-2023-final</ext-link>.</comment></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="CIT0006"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Grondona</surname>, <given-names>I</given-names></string-name>., <string-name><surname>Hermosa</surname>, <given-names>R</given-names></string-name>., <string-name><surname>Tejada</surname>, <given-names>M</given-names></string-name>., <string-name><surname>Gomis</surname>, <given-names>M.D</given-names></string-name>., <string-name><surname>Mateos</surname>, <given-names>P.F</given-names></string-name>., <string-name><surname>Bridge</surname>, <given-names>P.D</given-names></string-name>. <etal>et al</etal></person-group>., <year>1997</year>, &#x2018;<article-title>Physiological and biochemical characterization of trichoderma harzianum, a biological control agent against soilborne fungal plant pathogens</article-title>&#x2019;, <source><italic>Applied and Environmental Microbiology</italic></source> <volume>63</volume>(<issue>8</issue>), <fpage>3189</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>3198</lpage>. <comment><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.63.8.3189-3198.1997">https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.63.8.3189-3198.1997</ext-link></comment></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="CIT0007"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>He</surname>, <given-names>D.-C</given-names></string-name>., <string-name><surname>He</surname>, <given-names>M.-H</given-names></string-name>., <string-name><surname>Amalin</surname>, <given-names>D.M</given-names></string-name>., <string-name><surname>Liu</surname>, <given-names>W</given-names></string-name>., <string-name><surname>Alvindia</surname>, <given-names>D.G</given-names></string-name>. &#x0026; <string-name><surname>Zhan</surname>, <given-names>J</given-names></string-name></person-group>., <year>2021</year>, &#x2018;<article-title>Biological control of plant diseases: An evolutionary and eco-economic consideration</article-title>&#x2019;, <source><italic>Pathogens</italic></source> <volume>10</volume>(<issue>10</issue>), <fpage>1311</fpage>. <comment><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens10101311">https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens10101311</ext-link></comment></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="CIT0008"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Kaliyati</surname>, <given-names>J.R</given-names></string-name>., <string-name><surname>Mapope</surname>, <given-names>N</given-names></string-name>. &#x0026; <string-name><surname>Manyangarirwa</surname>, <given-names>W</given-names></string-name></person-group>., <year>2023</year>, &#x2018;<article-title>Disease management in cleome gynandra: A review</article-title>&#x2019;, <source><italic>International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology</italic></source> <volume>8</volume>(<issue>7</issue>), <fpage>3307</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>3313</lpage>. <comment><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8304414">https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8304414</ext-link></comment></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="CIT0009"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Kapsa</surname>, <given-names>J</given-names></string-name></person-group>., <year>2009</year>, &#x2018;<article-title>Effectiveness of some fungicides in control of <italic>Alternaria alternata</italic> and <italic>Alternaria solani</italic></article-title>&#x2019;, <source><italic>Eleventh Euroblight workshop Hamar (Norway)</italic></source> <volume>13</volume>, <fpage>127</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>134</lpage>.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="CIT0010"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Loona</surname>, <given-names>D</given-names></string-name>., <string-name><surname>Singh</surname>, <given-names>R</given-names></string-name>., <string-name><surname>Chittaragi</surname>, <given-names>A</given-names></string-name>. &#x0026; <string-name><surname>Patil</surname>, <given-names>B</given-names></string-name></person-group>., <year>2024</year>, &#x2018;<article-title><italic>In-vitro</italic> and field evaluation of foliar fungicides for the management of Alternaria leaf blight in Radish (<italic>Raphanus sativus</italic> L.)</article-title>&#x2019;, <source><italic>Crop protection</italic></source> <volume>187</volume>(<issue>2</issue>), <fpage>1006967</fpage>. <comment><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2024.106967">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2024.106967</ext-link></comment></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="CIT0011"><mixed-citation publication-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Mahr</surname>, <given-names>D.L</given-names></string-name>., <string-name><surname>Whitaker</surname>, <given-names>P</given-names></string-name>. &#x0026; <string-name><surname>Ridgway</surname>, <given-names>N</given-names></string-name></person-group>., <year>2008</year>, &#x2018;<chapter-title>Biological control of insects and mites: An introduction to beneficial natural enemies and their use in pest management</chapter-title>&#x2019;, <source><italic>Biological Control of Insects and Mites</italic></source>, pp. <fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>60</lpage>, <publisher-name>University of Wisconsin&#x2013;Extension</publisher-name>, <publisher-loc>Madison, WI</publisher-loc>.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="CIT0012"><mixed-citation publication-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Malato</surname>, <given-names>G</given-names></string-name></person-group>., <year>2023</year>, <source><italic>An introduction to the Shapiro-Wilk test for normality</italic></source>, <publisher-name>Built In Data Science</publisher-name>, <publisher-loc>Chicago</publisher-loc>, <comment>viewed n.d., from <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://builtin.com/data-science/shapiro-wilk-test">https://builtin.com/data-science/shapiro-wilk-test</ext-link>.</comment></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="CIT0013"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Meena</surname>, <given-names>S</given-names></string-name>., <string-name><surname>Gobika</surname>, <given-names>S</given-names></string-name>., <string-name><surname>Ghasolia</surname>, <given-names>R.P</given-names></string-name>., <string-name><surname>Sumitra</surname></string-name>, <string-name><surname>Nitharwal</surname>, <given-names>N</given-names></string-name>. &#x0026; <string-name><surname>Kardam</surname>, <given-names>V.K</given-names></string-name></person-group>., <year>2022</year>, &#x2018;<article-title>Management of Alternaria blight disease (<italic>Alternaria brassicae</italic>) of mustard through plant extracts and fungicides</article-title>&#x2019;, <source><italic>The Pharma Innovation Journal</italic></source> <volume>11</volume>(<issue>1</issue>), <fpage>58</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>67</lpage>, <comment>viewed n.d., from <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://www.thepharmajournal.com/archives/2022/vol11issue1/PartA/11-1-331-372.pdf">https://www.thepharmajournal.com/archives/2022/vol11issue1/PartA/11-1-331-372.pdf</ext-link>.</comment></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="CIT0014"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Mushrif</surname>, <given-names>S</given-names></string-name>., <string-name><surname>Venkat</surname>, <given-names>D</given-names></string-name>., <string-name><surname>Reddy</surname>, <given-names>M</given-names></string-name>. &#x0026; <string-name><surname>Sood</surname>, <given-names>M</given-names></string-name></person-group>., <year>2023</year>, &#x2018;<article-title>Bio efficacy of fungicides against <italic>Alternaria porri</italic> causing the purple blotch disease of onion</article-title>&#x2019;, <source><italic>Biological Forum &#x2013; An International Journal</italic></source> <volume>15</volume>(<issue>9</issue>), <fpage>623</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>630</lpage>.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="CIT0015"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Pal</surname>, <given-names>K.K</given-names></string-name>. &#x0026; <string-name><surname>McSpadden Gardener</surname>, <given-names>B</given-names></string-name></person-group>., <year>2006</year>, &#x2018;<article-title>Biological control of plant pathogens</article-title>&#x2019;, <source><italic>The Plant Health Instructor</italic></source>. <comment><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1094/PHI-A-2006-1117-02">https://doi.org/10.1094/PHI-A-2006-1117-02</ext-link></comment></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="CIT0016"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Pandit</surname>, <given-names>M.A</given-names></string-name>., <string-name><surname>Kumar</surname>, <given-names>J</given-names></string-name>., <string-name><surname>Gulati</surname>, <given-names>S</given-names></string-name>., <string-name><surname>Bhandari</surname>, <given-names>N</given-names></string-name>., <string-name><surname>Mehta</surname>, <given-names>P</given-names></string-name>., <string-name><surname>Katyal</surname>, <given-names>R</given-names></string-name>. <etal>et al</etal></person-group>., <year>2022</year>, &#x2018;<article-title>Major biological control strategies for plant pathogens</article-title>&#x2019;, <source><italic>Pathogens</italic></source> <volume>11</volume>(<issue>2</issue>), <fpage>273</fpage>. <comment><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens11020273">https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens11020273</ext-link></comment></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="CIT0017"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Panek</surname>, <given-names>M</given-names></string-name>., <string-name><surname>Helmer</surname>, <given-names>&#x0160;</given-names></string-name>. &#x0026; <string-name><surname>Ali</surname>, <given-names>A</given-names></string-name></person-group>., <year>2022</year>, &#x2018;<article-title>Use of metalaxyl against some soil plant pathogens of the class Peronosporomycetes &#x2013; A review and two case studies</article-title>&#x2019;, <source><italic>Plant Protection Science</italic></source> <volume>58</volume>(<issue>2</issue>), <fpage>92</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>109</lpage>. <comment><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.17221/42/2021-PPS">https://doi.org/10.17221/42/2021-PPS</ext-link></comment></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="CIT0018"><mixed-citation publication-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Razdan</surname>, <given-names>V.K</given-names></string-name>., <string-name><surname>Gupta</surname>, <given-names>S.R</given-names></string-name>. &#x0026; <string-name><surname>Peshin</surname>, <given-names>A.K</given-names></string-name></person-group>., <year>2009</year>, &#x2018;<chapter-title>Integrated disease management: Concepts and practices</chapter-title>&#x2019;, in <person-group person-group-type="editor"><string-name><given-names>A.K.</given-names> <surname>Dhawan</surname></string-name> (ed.)</person-group>, <source><italic>Integrated pest management: Innovation-development process</italic></source>, pp. <fpage>369</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>370</lpage>, <comment>Chapter 15</comment>, <publisher-name>Springer Science + Business Media B.V.</publisher-name> <comment><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8992-3_15">https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8992-3_15</ext-link></comment></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="CIT0019"><mixed-citation publication-type="thesis"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Scheufele</surname>, <given-names>S.B</given-names></string-name></person-group>., <year>2013</year>, &#x2018;<article-title>Alternaria leaf spot of brassica crops: Disease incidence and sustainable management</article-title>&#x2019;, <comment>MSc thesis</comment>, <publisher-name>Cornell University</publisher-name>.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="CIT0020"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Torres</surname>, <given-names>D.E</given-names></string-name>., <string-name><surname>Rojas-Mart&#x00ED;nez</surname>, <given-names>R.I</given-names></string-name>., <string-name><surname>Zavaleta-Mej&#x00ED;a</surname>, <given-names>E</given-names></string-name>., <string-name><surname>Guevara-Fefer</surname>, <given-names>P</given-names></string-name>., <string-name><surname>M&#x00E1;rquez-Guzm&#x00E1;n</surname>, <given-names>G.J</given-names></string-name>. &#x0026; <string-name><surname>P&#x00E9;rez-Mart&#x00ED;nez</surname>, <given-names>C</given-names></string-name></person-group>., <year>2017</year>, &#x2018;<article-title>Cladosporium cladosporioides and Cladosporium pseudocladosporioides as potential new fungal antagonists of Puccinia horiana Henn., the causal agent of chrysanthemum white rust</article-title>&#x2019;, <source><italic>PLoS One</italic></source> <volume>12</volume>(<issue>1</issue>), <fpage>e0170782</fpage>. <comment><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0170782">https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0170782</ext-link></comment></mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="CIT0021"><mixed-citation publication-type="book"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Troncoso-Rojas</surname>, <given-names>R</given-names></string-name>. &#x0026; <string-name><surname>Tiznado-Hern&#x00E1;ndez</surname>, <given-names>M.E</given-names></string-name></person-group>., <year>2014</year>, &#x2018;<chapter-title>Alternaria alternata (Black rot, black spot)</chapter-title>&#x2019;, in <person-group person-group-type="editor"><string-name><given-names>S.</given-names> <surname>Bautista-Ba&#x00F1;os</surname></string-name> (ed.)</person-group>, <source><italic>Postharvest decay: Control strategies</italic></source>, pp. <fpage>147</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>187</lpage>, <publisher-name>Academic Press</publisher-name>, <publisher-loc>San Diego, CA</publisher-loc>.</mixed-citation></ref>
<ref id="CIT0022"><mixed-citation publication-type="journal"><person-group person-group-type="author"><string-name><surname>Woudenberg</surname>, <given-names>J.H.C</given-names></string-name>., <string-name><surname>Truter</surname>, <given-names>M</given-names></string-name>., <string-name><surname>Greenewald</surname>, <given-names>J.Z</given-names></string-name>. &#x0026; <string-name><surname>Gous</surname>, <given-names>P.W</given-names></string-name></person-group>., <year>2014</year>, &#x2018;<article-title>Large-Spored Alternaria pathogens in section porri disentangled</article-title>&#x2019;, <source><italic>Studies in Mycology</italic></source> <volume>79</volume>(<issue>1</issue>), <fpage>1</fpage>&#x2013;<lpage>47</lpage>. <comment><ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.simyco.2014.07.003">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.simyco.2014.07.003</ext-link></comment></mixed-citation></ref>
</ref-list>
<fn-group>
<fn><p><bold>How to cite this article:</bold> Kaliyati, J.R., Mapope, N. &#x0026; Manyangarirwa, W., 2026, &#x2018;Management of <italic>Alternaria</italic> species diseases on <italic>Cleome gynandra</italic> in Zimbabwe&#x2019;, <italic>Journal of Underutilised Crops Research</italic> 5(1), a42. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.4102/jucr.v5i1.42">https://doi.org/10.4102/jucr.v5i1.42</ext-link></p></fn>
</fn-group>
</back>
</article>